For a show that prides itself on diversity, Bridgerton has repeatedly failed in providing good writing and storytelling for its more diverse characters, something that I plan to look into in more depth at a later date, however, today I am going to do a short overview post on one such situation. This post will look at the failures in the storytelling for Kate, and by extension Kate and Anthony as a couple, predominantly looking at the missed opportunities on the part of the writers, both in season 2 and in season 3.
Image Credit: Netflix
Kates Past
I believe this is one of the biggest failings in storytelling from the production.
Whilst we see some very good character development for Kate in her season, mostly due to the incredible acting of Simone Ashley as opposed to good writing for her character, we are still none the wiser about what actually shaped her and made her become the character we see in the beginning of the season, whilst we see what shaped Anthony through the use of flashbacks telling his story. I realise that some may argue that we learned of Kate's past through dialogue, but whilst we learned a few snippets in this manner we didn't see the impact the big life events had in moulding her character. This is a huge failing in my opinion.
Season 2 set up Kate and Anthony to be mirrors of each other, with their experiences in life meant to reflect each others. However, this mirroring was never fleshed out in the storytelling. We saw one side of the mirror that was Kate and Anthony, almost as if the mirror was blacked out and there was no reflection, leading to the situation where the viewer had to infer the reflection (something which social media discourse tells us many failed at). As indicated above, brief mentions of Kate past were present, and we could see the way that Kate was treated by her half sister, her stepmother, and her stepmother's parents, however, nothing showed us how they got to that point. We were told about their perceived relationships, but this was rarely done from Kate's perspective, and so it was set up for Kate to be a bit part in her own season whilst they focused on other characters.
One thing that highlighted the way that Kate's past was treated in her own season, compared to other characters, was the flashback given to Penelope, who would be the protagonist of season 3. This flashback for Penelope gave us a glimpse in to her recent past and was perhaps something that could have been saved for Penelope's season instead of including it in Kate's season when we didn't find out anything about Kate's past - recent or otherwise. In fact we know more about Penelope's past BEFORE her season than we ever found out about Kate's past DURING her season. The line in episode 5 where Kate says "My mother had a name" resonates, of course her mother had a name - but what was it? We never find out that name, in fact we know nothing about Kate's mother except that she was dead and that Kate had her wedding bangles. We know Penelope's mothers name, we know Simon's mothers name, so why is Kate the only Bridgerton spouse (so far) that we don't know the name of?
It isn't just Kate's mother's name, there is a lot about Kate's mother, and Kate's father, that shaped who she was as a character, but the show failed to tell us for the sake of melodrama, and spending more time than was needed on the Featherington family. By the end of season 2 it feels like we knew more about Penelope's background, history and family life than Kate's and this is unacceptable for a lead of a season.
What makes this worse for many is that Kate is a dark skinned South Asian woman of colour, she has been used by the production to highlight the diverse casting and position themselves with this point of difference in the world of historical romance, but in the season when she was the female lead the writers gave more prominence to telling the background of the white season 3 lead. I feel that this is one of the most egregious failures of the Bridgerton production.
Wedding
The very first post I wrote and posted on Tumblr spoke about why a wedding for Kate and Anthony made sense. I discussed why a wedding made sense for Kate and Anthony's story, and this is something that I still believe to be the case. A wedding to bring these two characters together towards the end of their season would not have been only about providing fan service, nor would it have been about showing a wedding in a romance, but it could have shown a very important aspect of the relationship between Kate and Anthony going forward, cementing their commitment to each other, as well as to themselves, after spending so much of their lives living for other people.
Over and above the idea of this commitment, a wedding for Kate and Anthony would be a chance to show, and not only tell us, Anthony's promises from throughout the season. In episode 2 at Lady Danbury's soiree we see Anthony say to Edwina that 'pretty words are well and good, but they are useless unless backed by action', and then in episode 8 we see Anthony say to Kate that he wants a life that suits them both. A wedding for Kate and Anthony could link those two statements, giving action to Anthony's words and showing us his intent and promise as opposed to just telling us about them. Whilst for some fans a wedding may not be seen as important, or something that is needed in the show, I would argue that for Kate and Anthony's story it was important to show that Anthony truly wanted to see them have a life that suited them both through action. How better to do that than show them beginning their life together with a culturally fused wedding that included Indian elements with a traditional Church of England wedding. So, a wedding for Kate and Anthony that included Indian elements as well as traditional English elements would, in my view, be putting action to Anthony's 'pretty words' of wanting a life to suit them both.
Whilst a wedding would be putting the action to words, there is one other reason for why not having a wedding was a failure for Kate and Anthony (and their fans) that wasn't included in my first post. I see that a wedding for Kate and Anthony would show the viewer them committing to each other with love, which would be a completion to their season 2 arc, showing how each of them opened themselves to love and chose something - and someone - for themselves instead of them both just doing what they believed was right for everyone else. A wedding would also show us that Kate has let go of her trauma and know that she is loved unconditionally and does not need to be useful to anyone to be loved, and similarly we could see Anthony let go of some of his trauma and see him marrying not out of duty but because he was in love.
So far in this series Kate and Anthony are the only couple that have gone to the altar completely open with their love and their lives, and this was their story arc - learning to become open with themselves and their love of themselves and each other. This is why I reject the premise that a wedding for Kate and Anthony had no narrative purpose, I truly believe that a wedding for them would close their season 2 arc, and allow for their post marriage story to begin in season 3.
Baby
This is something that is unforgivable in my opinion, and though there are some in the Bridgerton fandom who don't understand (or care) and are saying 'but we saw Kate pregnant' as a reason that us actually seeing the baby wasn't important shows a lack of media literacy in some, as for Kate and Anthony, I would argue, it was very important for us to see a baby at the end of season 3 - more so than seeing one for Penelope and the Featherington girls.
The first, and most obvious, reason that not seeing Kate give birth and have a baby in season 3 was a failure is the way it exposes the ineptness of the writer's room in being unable - or unwilling - to complete a story arc they started. The show runner and the writers had Kate and Anthony's whole season 3 story revolve around Kate getting - then being - pregnant, but then they failed to follow that storyline though, basically there was no pay off for the viewers. I briefly mentioned this as one of the failures of season 3 in a previous post here.
Kate and Anthony's story in season 3 ended with them travelling to India, however the story arc that was begun for Kate and Anthony was never completed. This exposed the writers, and show runner as failing in the most basic aspects of storytelling that most primary school children know - that a cohesive story has a start, a middle and an ending. Whether this failure in the storytelling was as a result of contempt for the characters, laziness or incompetence is hard to know, but whatever the reason the show runner has not only failed the characters, but also the viewers, with this incomplete storyline.
The missed opportunity for storytelling by failing to show Kate having a baby is immense and could have gone beyond showing an impact for Kate and Anthony as characters. With the obvious use of a birthing scene being used for Anthony's healing, this scene could have also been used to progress Eloise's growth and work towards preparing her for her own season by providing a contrast between Edmund's birth and Hyacinth's birth. Most importantly an expanded pregnancy storyline, and a birthing scene could have been used to show us some of Kate's past through the use of flashbacks to Kate's birth (and maybe even Edwina's birth), but the storyline itself could have been a way to provide context to Kate as a character, bringing in her mother and showing us more of Kate's past. For two seasons there has been discussion around Anthony requiring an heir, with emphasis on this in season 2, and the writers just ignored all of that by showing no imagination and using lazy storytelling.
Aside from the storytelling aspects, by failing to follow through with Kate and Anthony's storyline in season 3 and not showing us their baby, the show runner and writers have solidified the negative perception that many have of the production, especially in relation to the commitment that Shondaland, Netflix and the Bridgerton production truly have to diversity in the show. It is becoming clearer to many that the characters of Kate and Anthony are being given less, and treated as lesser, than other couples, and it has not escaped their notice that they are the characters played by an openly gay man and a dark skinned South Asian woman. When a couple that had no indication of a baby in their story arc in season 3 finishes the season with a baby, but the couple whose entire story arc was about having a baby doesn't get a baby, it shows an inequality and a distinct disparity in the way that the showrunner, the producers and the writers see the characters.
One pairing appear to be loved by the production, with the production appearing to have bent over backwards to have the viewers love them as well, whilst ensuring they get everything that is expected and anticipated in a romance, whilst the other couple have had their major life moments as a couple relegated to being offscreen. This is something that rankles many fans, and as noted above it hasn't been missed that the couple that are being treated as lesser are the couple played by an openly gay man and dark skinned South Asian woman, whilst the couple that is loved by the production are played by straight white actors.